More information about this seller Contact this seller 7. About this Item: Condition: As New. Unread copy in perfect condition. Seller Inventory More information about this seller Contact this seller 8. Seller Inventory n. More information about this seller Contact this seller 9. Published by Penguin UK Aug Condition: Neu. Neuware - A fascinating examination of ethics, religion and psychology, this selection of Schopenhauer's works contains scathing attack on the nature and logic of religion, and an essay on ethics that ranges from the American slavery debate to the vices of Buddhism.
Throughout history, some books have changed the world. They have transformed the way we see ourselves - and each other. They have inspired debate, dissent, war and revolution. They have enlightened, outraged, provoked and comforted. They have enriched lives - and destroyed them.
The Horrors and Absurdities of Religion
Now Penguin brings you the works of the great thinkers, pioneers, radicals and visionaries whose ideas shook civilization and helped make us who we are. More information about this seller Contact this seller Language: English. Brand new Book. A fascinating examination of ethics, religion and psychology, this selection of Schopenhauer's works contains scathing attack on the nature and logic of religion, and an essay on ethics that ranges from the American slavery debate to the vices of Buddhism.
Seller Inventory APG About this Item: A fascinating examination of ethics, religion and psychology, this selection of Schopenhauer's works contains scathing attack on the nature and logic of religion, and an essay. About this Item: Penguin Classics, Condition: Brand New. In Stock. Condition: Used; Good. We are committed to providing each customer with the highest standard of customer service. All books are picked, packed and dispatched from the United Kingdom.
Seller Inventory FH Condition: Very Good. All books are pre-owned and will have been read by someone else before you. They may well show signs of minor wear and tear. Please note, cover images are illustrative only, and the actual book cover and edition can vary.
About this Item: Paperback. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged. Seller Inventory GOR Islam: Total Blind Surrender to the Will of. This has led to the spiritual enslavement of Muslims. In this controversial religious treatise, author Kingdom Business: A Biblical discussion of race, religion,. Kingdom business discusses race, religion, and politics from a Biblical perspective.
The book discusses the The book discusses the Obama phenomenon and how Christians should relate their faith in regards to politics. Lectures on the Origin and Growth of Religion. Lectures on the Origin and Growth of Religion by C. This book is This book is a reproduction of the original book published in [n. Mass and the Sacraments: A Course in Religion. The doctrine and history of the 7 Sacraments.
- Advances in Deep Foundations: International Workshop on Recent Advances of Deep Foundations (IWDPF07)1-2 February 2007, Port and Airport Research Institute, Yokosuka, Japan.
- Penguin's Great Ideas Series - Librivox wiki.
- The Horrors and Absurdities of Religion;
- Product description;
- Horrors and Absurdities of Religion Summary!
Also covers Indulgences and Sacramentals. Topics include Topics include the Scriptural background of the Sacraments, their institution by Christ, essential requirements for receiving them, their effects in the soul, etc. Will deepen understanding of Nothing But! From sermons and clerical reports to personal stories of faith, this book of translated primary Although the points made on either side will be largely familiar to most readers, this constitutes the best portion of the book and is still an entertaining read that occasionally gives pause for thought with relevance to the modern world :- "Even if a real true philosophy had taken the place of religion, nine-tenths of mankind at the very least would recei This volume opens with 'On Religion: A Dialogue' which discusses, alternately, the utility of religion and how it endangers rational thought.
Although the points made on either side will be largely familiar to most readers, this constitutes the best portion of the book and is still an entertaining read that occasionally gives pause for thought with relevance to the modern world :- "Even if a real true philosophy had taken the place of religion, nine-tenths of mankind at the very least would receive it on authority, so that it too would be a matter of belief. The main insight that can be drawn from reading these is, unfortunately, not a philosophical one but only that Schopenhauer was wildly misanthropic and illiberal, and that he held himself in far greater esteem than he did the hoi-polloi.
There are many attempts made to coin aphorisms throughout, so much so that I began to suspect that Schopenhauer's aims lay more in crafting them and having them be quoted than it did in properly and clearly communicating his ideas. It is unfortunate that though several of these would-be aphorisms hit the mark and the best of them has already been quoted in a review by Jason Mills , the majority lack that necessary ring of truth.
I think that Schoenhauer's distaste for the masses and his desire for validation from his peers the two principles pervading this volume is well borne-out by what he states in 'On Various Subjects' 5B: "The great misfortune for intellectual merit is that it has to wait until the good is praised by those who produce only the bad; indeed, the misfortune already lies in the general fact that it has to receive its crown from the hands of human judgement, a quality of which most people possess about as much as a castrate possesses of the power to beget children.
View all 4 comments. Jan 27, Frank Sloth Aaskov rated it it was ok. It was an okay read. Often it just discussed the philosophy of enlightenment, instead of the absurdity and horrors of religions.
Instead, start with Dawkins' It was an okay read. Dec 05, Roisin rated it really liked it. Small but mighty! Often amusing and enlightening, this is a fabulous series of short writings against religion and examines ethics too. Schopenhauer uses the words, ideas and beliefs of Kant, Herodotus, Ancient Greece, Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism and Islam, among others to make short and to the point comments about religious ideas and concepts that don't make sense or have been borrowed, or influenced by other religions. In some of the writings further on he considers belief and what leads in Small but mighty!
In some of the writings further on he considers belief and what leads individuals to trust in such ideas, the devil, sin, hypocrisy, human behaviour using the treatment of slaves in American slave owning states for example. Well thought, well argued. Wonderful stuff! Aug 08, Chris rated it it was ok. Not really a page-turner, or even very compelling. Not much to disagree with, however. Of interest to students of the Enlightenment, or those who have suffered even if only psychologically , at the hands of dogmatic religions and their adherents.
I'm interested in philosophy, but often, works by philosophers, such as this, are merely the collections of their random, unedited, and unstructured thoughts. View 1 comment. Dec 10, Tim rated it really liked it. Some good thoughts from a man who learned from the ancients and was an early student of Buddhism and Indian religions but thought for himself. Random example, from a dialogue on religion - and I pick this one just because it's short, while some of his aphorisms are a little wordy: "in the eyes of the friend of truth every fraud, however pious, is still a fraud.
A pack of lies would be a strange means of inducing virtue. Sep 15, Doug Newdick rated it liked it Shelves: philosophy. This short collection of Schopenhauer's writings focusses on religion, but in a way that may be unfamiliar. Schopenhauer argues that religion is an allegory that cannot reveal it is an allegory. That somehow it uses falsehood to tell greater truths.
He seems ambivalent towards religion, especially Christianity.
Customer Reviews: The Horrors and Absurdities of Religion
Alternatively he defends it and condemns it. He appears to be too much a creature of his time to understand the full implications of his reasoning. Sep 05, George Neville-Neil rated it liked it Shelves: discarded. If you not read these arguments in other forms then this is an amusing little book.
Otherwise it's only OK. May 02, Khalifa Said rated it it was amazing. Simple and straight to the point, I consider this book to be philosophy simplified. Jun 25, Ahmed Farrag rated it liked it Shelves: philosophy. Mar 27, Anders rated it liked it. And if you are shocked at the misery you should turn your eyes to its wickedness. Then you will see that they balance one another, you will become aware of the existence of an eternal justice, that the world itself is its own universal Last Judgement, and you will begin to understand why everything that lives must atone for its existence, first by living and then by dying.
A friend of mine kept bringing him up because he was interested in articulating a coherent version of metaphysical pessimism and then I ran across this edition, a part of the Penguin great ideas series which I love for their covers so of course I bought it. So what about Schopenhauer?
Well the first part is a dialogue on religion.
The Horrors and Absurdities of Religion by Arthur Schopenhauer
Very tongue in cheek. The guy who argues against religion is called truth-lover. And the basic point is that religion is only ever allegorically true but that really just means its either trivial or deceptive so there you have it. The rest of the stuff is observations, some interesting, others perplexingly logical.
I've included a few for your amusement. I will say the pessimism is interesting. Maybe not compelling, but interesting in its own way. The idea of necessity he brings up in the second quote below is compelling in its connection with what we deserve. I'm not so sure about this notion of deserving and whether we know what we deserve. But maybe suffering does indicate to us something of what we deserve. Sometimes when philosophy borders too much on aphorism its hard to really delve into it.
Or maybe I'm just being lazy. The third quote below made me think maybe more pointedly about how suffering conditions people to see their lives. Happiness, unhappiness. Well anyway, I didn't plan on saying a whole lot in this review and I'm tired tonight besides so I'll just say this is a fast read if at times a little obtuse and at others too Schopenhauer. I will say that his very very brief analysis of Greek mythology is absolute fucking horeshit.
So there's that. Anyway, happy reading!
If, on the other hand, all religions were in the same way declared untrue, we should go on living as before under the protection of the law alone without any special precautions. The outcome however is a moral one, namely this, that by what we do we know what we are, just as by what we suffer we know what we deserve. With possession, or the certain prospect of it, our demands straightway increase and this increases our capacity for further possessions and wider prospects. If, on the contrary, constant misfortune has contracted our spirit and reduced our demands to a minimum, we lack the capacity to receive a sudden piece of good fortune; for since it meets with no existing demands which neutralize it, it produces an apparently positive effect and thus acts with its full force: so that it can burst the spirit asunder, i.
Jan 19, Michael de Percy rated it really liked it Shelves: reviewed. I have second-hand knowledge of Schopenhauer's "the will to live is consecrated in the act of procreation" thesis, and while it makes a brief appearance, much of this collection is focused on religion.
The "On Various Subjects" section reads a little like La Rochefoucauld's Maxims , and makes some interesting assertions about genius it is OK to make mistakes, just your masterpiece ought to be inimitable ; on the farcical nature of higher education perception must precede concept, not the other I have second-hand knowledge of Schopenhauer's "the will to live is consecrated in the act of procreation" thesis, and while it makes a brief appearance, much of this collection is focused on religion.
The "On Various Subjects" section reads a little like La Rochefoucauld's Maxims , and makes some interesting assertions about genius it is OK to make mistakes, just your masterpiece ought to be inimitable ; on the farcical nature of higher education perception must precede concept, not the other way around ; an early statement concerning animal rights p. Now to religion. Some of my favourites: All religion is antagonistic towards culture; The absurdities of dogma The latter explains the dialogue On Religion , which, although I understand Schopenhauer was atheistic, appeared on the surface to be bombastic, but might otherwise resonate with court judges who have been confronted with decisions concerning the existence of God, and have deferred on the grounds that, in effect, "faith and knowledge" are different.
Nevertheless, there is in this work the attitude of The Enlightenment that rational individuals cannot possibly believe in God. That said, there is little to surprise the modern reader, but Schopenhauer was one of the few Western students of India and Buddhism, and his insights demonstrate that the glory days Conservatives dream about did not really exist in the nineteenth century, the counterfactuals were simply hidden from majority view. But to disclose the real gem in this work, I found another piece to the riddle of Benjamin Franklin.
One of his "virtues" is "moderation". This is not a riddle in itself, but when "temperance" is also one of the virtues, what is so special about moderation that it should stand alone? Schopenhauer explains in the essay On Ethics by setting out some of the differences between Eastern and Western virtues and vices. For Schopenhauer, "virtues are qualities of will", which means that cowardice cannot be a vice if we have the "will to live"! The Platonic virtues closely align with Franklin's,one of which Cicero translated as temperantia , which is"in English moderation ".
Schopenhauer states: [Moderation] is a very vague and ambiguous expression under which many different things can be subsumed, such as prudence, sobriety, keeping one's head. To Franklin, "avoiding extremes".